The Best of Nostradamus and the New
Prophecy Almanacs Email Forums

(Part Two)

 

Welcome to the best -- and the strangest -- email correspondence that has appeared on this web site since 1999. This page represents the second installment of what will be several such pages.
Some of the entries that appear in "the best of" pages may later be removed and used for other purposes. For example those emails dealing with my base 7 system may eventually be placed on a special Base 7 forum as supplemental material for those reading the "Base 7 Numerology: Introduction and FAQ" page.
As usual, you can write me at my address: mmcclellan@adelphia.net.
All new correspondence deemed appropriate for posting will appear on the Early 21st Century Forum, the Princess Diana Forum, and the Pope Forum (and any other forums I may yet come up with).

 

Note: Due to email server problems, you may have some periodic difficulty reaching me at the above address. If you receive a bounce or error message, please keep trying or save message for another day and try. You will eventually get through to me.

Also, PLEASE DO NOT SEND ATTACHMENTS! If you have an article for me to read, please supply a URL to the article's site or paste the article into your email message.

HATE MAIL, 'PRANK' MAIL, or SPAM (even prophecy-related SPAM) of any kind will not be tolerated. Your email address will be placed in my blocked folder and all future messages from you will be auto-deleted.

Please do not send me six-to-ten pre-packaged emails all at once that were prepared for mass circulation. Keep your correspondence personal (one-to-one).


 


Topic: Future Naval Battles (2000 - 2006)

-----Original Message-----
From:
Brian
To: 'mmcclellan@adelphia.net' <mmcclellan@adelphia.net>
Date: Thursday, March 30, 2000 3:32 PM
Subject: Question

Michael,

I have read with MUCH interest the items that you have been posting concerning any military confrontations in the future.  I am in the U.S. Navy and assigned to an aircraft carrier.  In your experience, have you come across any predictions or vectors concerning the sinking of any specific ships?  People trade rumors of predictions concerning the sinking of a floating city named after the stars (most probably the USS Constellation). Any insight that you might have will be most enlightening.

Thanks for you time and assistance.


Brian
* * * * *
Brian,

Before I proceed, let me briefly discuss the 'vectors' you mention.

As you may know already, not all of my 'vectors' (time windows I calculate using my own system of divination, base 7 numerology) are accurate or dependable. 69% to 87% of my predictions have occurred during the years I have specified, however less than half of the vectors (specific months) have been correct. For example, I predicted that the earthquakes in Turkey and Greece would occur in March and May 1999, but instead they occurred in August and September 1999. The prediction I made -- which was unusual because major quakes in Greece are rare and major quakes in both Turkey and Greece so close together are even more rare -- was correct and the year was correct, but the specific vectors were wrong.

Last year I said US warships in the Pacific would be attacked by China and/or North Korea in August 1999. It did not happen then or at any time in 1999. That prediction was one of the 13% that were entirely wrong.

With that said, allow me to address your concerns.

I too have read posts about this so-called 'floating city' being sunk and attributing the prophecy to Nostradamus.  I can assure you that after fifteen years of studying EVERY prophecy ever made by Nostradamus I have never come across anything that remotely resembles these claims.  I have no idea where these people are getting their ideas (poor translation skills perhaps?).

Now, what DOES he say?

That, unfortunately, would fill a book. There are numerous quatrains describing naval battles in the Adriatic Sea and the Mediterranean Sea everywhere from the Strait of Gibralter to the coast of the Middle East.

Quatrain 6.44 predicts that 'a great fleet will flounder' in 'the Arabian Gulf' (the Persian Gulf) at a time when Germany and Russia form a 'false' alliance (the Germans will be duped by Moscow).

In Quatrain 2.15 'Castor and Pollux' (whom I believe stand for Russia and the US) will be 'in the ship,' that is, their naval forces will be deployed in many key regions. They will either be enemies at this time or allies, although current events would seem to suggest the former. Quatrain 3.13 seems to indicate a submarine battle off the coast of New York City ('the greatest extended city') when 'the fleet swims submerged.' The 'two captives' (one of which 'devours' the other) must either be Russia and the US or China and the US.

In Quatrain 3.1 the entire Pacific Ocean ('the great Ocean') is 'placed in terror' by a 'Red Adversary' (most likely China) following a 'naval battle' with the US Pacific fleet.

According to Quatrain 8.9 French and US naval forces will be deployed to the eastern Mediterranean Sea (coast of Turkey, Syria, Lebanon, Israel, and Egypt) while ground troops are being sent into Hungary. This would indicate a renewal of war in the Balkans spreading to the rest of Eastern Europe (or Russia trying to reclaim former Soviet satellites) while war is raging in the Middle East. Quatrains 5.55, 1.9, 8.84, 2.30, and 9.28 indicate that an Arab coalition will attack Italy, Sicily, and Malta by sea. Both Libya and Iraq are implicated. This makes sense since these two Arab countries are reportedly forging strategic alliances with both Belgrade and Moscow. Western navies will prepare to engage the coalition in the 'Gulf of Trieste' (northern Adriatic) according to 8.84. A NATO or EU naval force will be deployed from Marseilles harbor and the Kvarner Gulf to Yugoslavia and Eastern Europe at the time Sicily and Italy are under Arab attack (9.28). In Quatrain 2.86 an unidentified fleet is destroyed in the Adriatic Sea.

In Quatrain 2.81 an 'African fleet' incinerates a city in Sardinia.

According to Quatrain 3.90 the leader of an Iranian fleet will station his ships off the coast of Beirut, Lebanon.

(10.88 and 1.18) 'Devastation' and 'blood' in the waters off the coast of Marseilles by a Moslem navy (this does not neccessarily mean Arab -- could be North African or Turkic/Persian). The US navy will apparently be aiding the French since Trident missiles are mentioned (2.59).

(3.82) Cities and towns in southeastern Provence are attacked by sea.

This is only a SMALL sampling. However, these are all of the identifiable predictions I feel pertain to the near future (2000 and the next six years). There are many more I believe deal with events much farther ahead (20 years to centuries from now). There are also many references to navies, ships and their captains, and fleets but they are far too general to pinpoint location or identity.

See if the following names make any sense to you:

Nostradamus actually names only one ship that I am aware of. In Quatrain 9.43 he writes of a battleship, possibly a flag ship, named the RAVIERE (Revere as in Paul Revere?). It will lead a fleet of ten warships in the eastern Mediteranean during a terrible war in the Middle East.

(2.21) An ARTON fleet. Many think ARTON is an anagram of NATO. It will give up on its mission and be replaced by a European Union navy.

(9.28) The SIMACLE sail. This has been translated as 'Allied,' but it could mean something else.

If I come up with other names I will let you know.


NOW, what does my base 7 system of numerology indicate?

At the present moment I have little, but I may have more in the near future.

1) Unfortunately, I still insist that the US Pacific fleet will be forced to go up against China and possibly North Korea sometime this year. Although April and May are strong vectors, China may stretch this thing out longer -- perhaps until the US presidential election in November. I see continued danger or warfare with China and North Korea from that point all the way to July 2001. If battle is not engaged with these enemies by that time, then the next vector of danger will not appear until March/April 2003. If a Sino-US war does not occur by then, it probably never will.

2) A US battleship or fleet will be attacked in the Persian Gulf in or around May 2001. Whether this will be an Arab, Iranian, or Russian attack I am uncertain.

3) Two major battles in the Persian Gulf involving the US navy and an Arab or Iranian one in October 2001 and May 2002. Given the scope of the Middle East war I envision, it is not unlikely that battle will be engaged in the Red Sea and eastern Mediteranean as well by 2002. Also, by this time, we may be substituting NATO for US.

4) US, Britain, and France will engage in a naval conflict with Libya and its North African allies in June 2002 and January 2003.

5) August/September 2003 is yet another vector for an unsuccessful Western attack by sea of targets in Iraq and Iran.

6) December 2003 and/or October 2004: US navy will be at war with Central and South American fleets supported by China if a Sino-US war does develop, especially if it begins in March/April 2003.

7) Western (including US) battleships will bombard Lebanon, Syria, and possibly Iraq by sea in February 2005.

8) There are no positive vectors for naval conflict between Russia and the US even though Nostradamus suggests there will be.  If a vector does become apparent I'll let you know.


Well, that took a while. Hope this is of some help.

If any of this material gives you reason to inquire further information from me please feel free to do so.

In any event, write again if you have any other questions.


Best regards,

Michael


mmcclellan@adelphia.net

http://www.geocities.com/Athens/Atrium/3933/

 

 

 


10 Questions

President Clinton/New York-East Coast/China/Second World War/Next Balkan War/Midwest Flooding/Sydney Olympics/Israel-Syria/Second Russian Revolution/Prophecies of St. Malachy

-----Original Message-----
From:
Jim
To: mmcclellan@adelphia.net <mmcclellan@adelphia.net>
Date: Friday, March 31, 2000 6:08 PM
Subject: Re: P.S. to Last Letter


Hi!  I've had a chance to peruse more of the ever-changing Nostradamus pages, and once again I'd like to commend you for a job well done!  I appreciated your reply to my last questions regarding the Shawnee Curse! It's interesting to discuss the possibilities with someone with a similar interest in history, and who seems to have a pretty good handle on how things happen and might happen in the future!  I do have a few questions and comments, and they are in no particular order, so pardon me if the list might be in somewhat of an incoherent order.  :)


1)  It seems that there are a lot of vectors coming to head in the Middle East/South Asia for spring of 2000, and in the news, there seem to be a lot of news items concerning this violent area of the world.  I wonder if one of those vectors may have been, instead of the death of a leader there (such as Saddam Hussein), the death of a U.S. President?  President Clinton had to, at the last minute, cancel a trip to a Bangladeshi city, and, in Pakistan, had to ride in an unmarked white plane instead of Air Force One.  Both of these were due to assassination threats made by anti-American factions within Bangladesh and Pakistan.  Needless to say, if the target of the prophecy was indeed President Clinton, the fulfillment was fortunately thwarted by the Secret Service and those in charge of the President's schedule.

2)  "Trouble for New York City and/or East Coast" -- The March window is past, and although you mention that danger exists for NYC into 2002, I wonder if the sharp rise in oil prices, devastating the Northeast trucking industry, might be the "trouble."  If OPEC is serious about boosting production, it seems that trouble may be behind us, at least for a few months.

3)  I personally don't believe China will raise military tensions with the U.S. over Taiwan before November.  Here's the reason why:  China has benefitted tremendously over the past 8 years with the most pro-China president since 1949.  It is to China's utmost benefit if Vice-President Gore succeeds Clinton as President in November.  As for Bush, although George W. Bush's father was decidedly pro-China, the GOP has shifted to a more anti-China stance over the past 8 years (look at Gary Bauer's extreme anti-China platform!), and no matter what George W. Bush's personal feelings about China, a Bush Administration would not be as sympathetic towards Beijing as a Gore Administration would be.  Beijing knows that if it acts bellicosely between now and November, those tensions would drive Americans over towards George W. Bush.  Expect China to remain quiet through November.

4)  Minor technicality on the "Emergency Window" page:  Britain and France declared war on Germany first, not vice versa.  Hitler invaded Poland to get a border with the USSR, his ultimate target.  When France and Britain rushed to Poland's aid, that was an annoyance that pushed back the invasion of the USSR by over a year.  Hitler would have been perfectly happy to keep peace with an appeasement-obsessed U.K.-France until after Russia was subjugated (probably by 1943).

5)  You mention many possible scenarios for the next Balkan War.  Are you as surprised as I am that Slobodan Milosevic is willing to live as long as he has with a committed pro-Western pro-American president as head of Montenegro?

6)  Any chance the "catastrophic flooding" of the summer of 2000 could be a catastrophic drought?  First, all the natural vectors are pointed towards drought for the summer of 2000.  The entire state of Iowa, for example, has already been placed by the National Weather Service under a drought warning in effect for the remainder of 2000.  Second, it seems almost impossible that we could surpass the mind-boggling once-per-millennium floods that destroyed the Midwest in 1993.

7)  Error on your page:  The Sydney Olympics start on September 15.  The July/August vector you give is mid-winter in Australia.  If the dates are accurate, then the event can't possibly be the Olympics.

8)  It's probably a pretty good bet that Israel and Syria will indeed sign a peace pact this fall.  That'll be President Clinton's legacy and will give a boost to Vice-President Gore's chances in November.


9)  Second Russian Revolution:  I agree that Russia is ripe for another revolution.  I'm just curious as to why Nostradamus' second Russian revolution for the 20th Century wasn't the Revolution of 1991?

10)  Any comments on the prophecy of St. Malachi that says that Pope John Paul II (who seems very close to death now) is the 3rd-to-last pope? Supposedly, the next pope will be a weak, short-lived pope, to be followed by a strong Pope "Peter II" ("Petros Romanus," I think), who would be the last pope...

Thanks for any comments you have!

---
Jim
* * * * *
Hi Jim!

Thanks for writing again and for your encouraging comments.

You have covered a great deal of territory. Hope you do not mind my replying in somewhat greater detail.

1) I agree it is possible that President Clinton may still be in danger of assassination. Indeed, I predicted that his life would be in danger in 1998 -- especially November 1998.  If you recall, he was to have made a trip to Pakistan that month (one that would have lasted several days and not a few hours like this year). A leader of a terrorist cell linked to Osama bin Laden even threatened that Clinton would be assassinated by his group if he went to Pakistan. The trip was then canceled just as this year's trip to Bangledesh was.


Someone who is advising the President really knows what he or she is doing. This would tend to support my conviction that Clinton has escaped death many times -- especially in 1994, 1998, and now 2000 -- because he is impervious to the Shawnee Curse (not being elected in a zero-ending year).

However, I am concerned about one thing: even if the synodic Jupiter-Venus air conjunction of 1980-81 had something to do with preventing the death by assassination of Ronald Reagan, how do we know another president doesn't have to make up for it's failure somehow? If that is true, Clinton may still be assassinated this year.  Even if he is, as mind-boggling and unprecedented as it may sound, the 2000-elect will also be assassinated or die in office (two presidents dead in consecutive terms).

I would also point out that, although it is extremely rare, a few of my predictions have been fulfilled one calendar year before or after the target year. I call this phenomenon an 'adjacent fulfillment.' In 1996 I predicted that Pakistan and India would conduct nuclear weapons tests and then begin a nuclear arms race and at least low-level fighting or a full-blown war in February 1997. However, this did not happen until the following calendar year in May 1998 -- 15 months later.  The vector for President Clinton's death was November 1998. An 'adjacent fulfillment' -- if there was going to be one -- should have occurred sometime in 1999. However, if we take the 15 months as the longest possible postponement, he could have died in office as recently as February 2000. We are now beyond that point.


We are now TWO calendar years past the target calendar year. If my prediction for 1998 --which I have already proved was CLOSE on the 'Failed Clinton Prophecy' page -- should actually be fulfilled sometime in what remains of 2000, this would be extremely rare. In four years of experiments (1996 - 1999) and well over a hundred separate predictions, I have had only three adjacent fulfillments occur -- and not one that happened TWO calendar years later or premature. I cannot say that a phenomenon such as this is impossible; however, thus far, it is not supported by the evidence I have compiled thus far in my experiments.

However, you may have not noticed on my Year 2000 (Part Two) page that another Western world leader is in danger this year. I have predicted a potential assassination of either British Prime Minister Tony Blair or one of three British royals -- Prince Philip, Prince Charles, or Prince Andrew. The vector of danger is September 2000. The assassins (or would-be assassins if they hopefully fail) will either be members of the IRA or an IRA splinter group or international terrorists.

2) The trouble for New York City/East Coast.

It is true that the March window has closed, but


a) Note the following post that has been on the prediction since 3/1/00: 'NOTE (3/1/00): If China's recent threat to launch nuclear strikes on the US is in any way connected with this prediction, the vector may need to be extended to April and May. The most dangerous days for those months are: April 5, 14, and 23 and May 4, 13, 22, and 31.'

b) Remember that my vectors are not always reliable. 69% to 87% of my predictions have occurred during the years I have specified, however only roughly half of the vectors (specific months) have been correct. For example, I predicted that the earthquakes in Turkey and Greece would occur in March and May 1999, but instead they occurred in August and September 1999. The prediction I made -- which was unusual because major quakes in Greece are rare and major quakes in both Turkey and Greece so close together are even more rare -- was correct and the year was correct, but the specific vectors were off by a factor of three months.

The New York City/East Coast prediction was very difficult to make without generalising. SOMETHING terrible was certainly indicated for New York City, the US East Coast, or the former Soviet Union (but which?). The time window we are in is exactly seven years after the World Trade Centre Bombing, fourteen years after the Chernobyl Disaster, twenty-one years after the Three Mile Island nuclear disaster, and thirty-five years after the Great Blackout of New York City (that, technically, was November 1965 and may still bode ill for this November). In 1972, twenty-eight years ago, I believe it was in May, an asteroid or a very large meteor narrowly missed colliding with the earth in the eastern United States (I have seen the film footage of the fireball); however, it managed to burn up over the Atlantic Ocean before an impact could occur. With the one exception, Chernobyl, the eastern US was the focus of all of these events.

Also, Nostradamus is quite clear that New York City will experience two cataclysmic disasters: one that will bring partial destruction to the city as well as portions of New Jersey, another that will completely incinerate the Big Apple. Even Edgar Cayce concurs that New York, Connecticut, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, and other coastal states will be partially (and permanently) inundated by unprecedented flooding sometime after 1998. All of his earth changes are projected to be completed by mid-21st century.

Bearing in mind what I said regarding the vectors being off by a factor of anywhere between a few days to three-and-half months, the New York/East Coast prediction could still happen as late as June or July.

Still, getting the year right is difficult enough. I grew weary of all the astrologers, psychics, and prophets (including the late Jeane Dixon) who used to make New Year's predictions for each coming year on television and in newspapers.  None of them rarely if ever committed themselves to any specific month or season. The following year we would check their score and it would always fall somewhere between 0 to 10% (often 0).

I also plainly state my predictions in words that are understandable to most people. Unlike another more popular prophet who is highly visible on the Internet and claims he predicted Princess Diana's death way back in 1995, I do not resort to an arcane or intentionally obscure form of 'mystical verse' smothered in symbolism and metaphor -- a Rorschach blot grammatically constructed in such a way that it can be interpreted a hundred different ways and be 'proven' correct no matter what happens. To a somewhat lesser extent, I could accuse Nostradamus of doing the very same thing in a number of his quatrains.

(I should point out that I am experimenting with new sound and letter systems to try to identify which celebrities are at risk of death or mishap. But I explain how these systems function and what they are based on -- I do not leave it to the imagination of the viewer. I also should warn that these systems are HIGHLY EXPERIMENTAL. 1999 -- the 'More and F' prediction -- was my first trial run.)

Obviously my base 7 numeric system has SOME value. And even if my accuracy rate for 2000 should fall to 50% or lower, how does one explain the unusual success of my first four years (the fourth, 1999, actually played out right on the web in 'real time' before thousands of witnesses)? One can be a lucky guesser, but not THAT lucky.

3) You may be right about China. Indeed, on my China Emergency Information Window the following has been appearing since March 26:  'China may be "the Orient" that "will be in great fear and dread" during another critical election or inauguration: the inauguration of Russian President Vladimir Putin on May 5, 2000, the US presidential election of November 5, 2000, or the inauguration of the US-elect in January 2001.'


In addition, I have uncovered another dangerous vector for hostilities for December 2000 to July 2001. However, the danger is a war between the US and NORTH KOREA. Obviously, this must be wrong -- with tensions as high as they are between China and Taiwan and Beijing and Washington, this new vector must herald a Sino-US conflict.  Then again, perhaps the US will be at war with BOTH countries (they WERE allied during the Korean War of 1950-53).

It is strange, though, how many potential multiple vectors there have already been for China and North Korea since 1998.  One of them, June 1999, was when the two Koreas clashed in the Yellow Sea (on June 15).  Another one for China in August 1999 was not far removed from the May 1999 NATO bombing of the Chinese Embassy in Belgrade.

This is the way it goes sometimes. Most predictions have only one or two vectors and no more. But then there are some with multiple potentials over a period of two, three, four, even five years.

4) I stand corrected on the issue of Germany and World War II. While it is true that Germany and Britain were each other's most important trading partners during the 1930s, you are right about who invaded whom first. I was confusing the First World War with the Second. Following the assassination of the Archduke and Duchess in Sarajevo in June 1914, Russia mobilized its army along the borders of Austria and Germany.  Because of this Germany declared war on Russia.  Because France supported the Russian action, Germany declared war on France and later Britain. I must have had that in mind when I was creating my analogy. One of the casualties of creating a web page hastily when being pressured due to lack of time.

5) Indeed, I am also surprised that the butcher of Belgrade has not yet moved on Montenegro. Along with Kosovo, it was a region I believed was in danger of being subjected to military invasion and possible genocide by Yugoslavia in 1998 and 1999. However, the timetable is catching up. Montenegro announced in January that it will definitely declare independence by December 2000. Milosevic said there will be war when that happens. Therefore, a new conflict within or involving Yugoslavia this year seems unavoidable -- one way or another (and one certainly is indicated by base 7).

6) You may be right about a catastrophic drought. But I must stand by the Midwest flood scenario -- however 'mind-boggling' and 'impossible' that may seem.

7) Unfortunately, July/August 2000 is the vector for the Olympics Terrorist Attack prediction. However, after reading what I have said about vectors, it should be apparent that September 15 is close enough. I mean, if it happens on September 22, would you really say my prediction was WRONG because it didn't happen in August? Remember what I said about expectations of psychics' and prophets' New Year's predictions. Just getting the year right is difficult enough.

8) We'll see on the Israeli-Syrian peace. There is an interesting contradiction: influences suggest a successful peace accord for Syria and Israel in September 2000 (I should also add, however, that this is also when a new peace accord between Israel and the PLO is now scheduled to be signed, so perhaps not). But next year, in 2001, influences are highly adverse around October/November, indicating war beginning between Israel and Syria, perhaps in the Golan Heights or elsewhere along the Israeli-Syrian border. Things progress from bad to even worse around April 2002 when the entire Middle East may become a huge battleground and Israel is invaded and conquered by an Iraqi-led coalition.

9) In Nostradamian 'lore' revolutions, especially the French and first Russian, are always described as bloody and violent. Also, he says that the second Russian revolution, like the first, will occur under the evil influence of Saturn. I do not think the French seer considered the 1991 revolution to be a true revolution.

10) St. Malachy is about the only ancient prophet who does not appear to concur with Nostradamus. According to Malachy, as you have pointed out, there should be only two more popes after John Paul II. However, Nostradamus describes the careers and deaths of many popes who have never reigned. For example I know of no pope who reigned for many years who had a nephew who later became pope himself. The nephew pope is later murdered by an evil cardinal and his followers. The evil cardinal then becomes pope himself. I know of no pope who ever died in Reggio at the time a strange celestial object appeared in the heavens. I know of no pope who reigned for only seven months and was killed by invading Albanian armies. I know of no pope who died during a major deluge in France in December and with him the Catholic faith itself.

The list goes on and on -- each pope somehow different and unique. Some have reigned, but many have not.

I, at least, feel that we can dispense with St. Malachy's prophecies (or dispense with Nostradamus' -- their predictions simply do NOT concur). Then again, perhaps Malachy could not see beyond 'Peter, the Roman,' mistakenly believing him to be the final end-of-time pope.

Well, that's about it I would think.

Thanks again for writing and please feel free to write again anytime!


Best regards,

Michael


mmcclellan@adelphia.net

-----Original Message-----
From:
Jim
To: mmcclellan@adelphia.net <mmcclellan@adelphia.net>
Date: Tuesday, April 04, 2000 10:09 PM
Subject: Re: P.S. to Last Letter


Thanks for your reply.  I find the subject of pondering what the future may hold fascinating.  I think I'm getting the hang of your base-7 system in figuring the dating of future events.  I do have one question about your methods however.  How do you figure out WHAT'S going to happen?  For instance, there's certainly a great probability that something meteorologically devastating is going to happen this year to the Central U.S. (it's 7 years after the Great Flood of 93).  You say another flood is coming; the NWS says it's a drought.  Other forms of devastation that can hit the Midwest during the summer include heat waves, tornado superoutbreaks (like the one in April 1974), smog from Western fires, dust storms, and more.  Base 7 may say that *something's* going to happen this summer regarding the weather, but does that something necessarily mean a flood?

BTW, I apologize profusely if you talked about this in your page. There's a lot of text you've posted, and I may have skipped over some of it without noticing the answers to my questions.  :)  (I admit, I'm the type that'll read the exciting stuff [the actual predictions] first!  :)


Now Jim quotes me from my first letter:

'Someone who is advising the President really knows what he or she is doing. This would tend to support my conviction that Clinton has escaped death many times -- especially in 1994, 1998, and now 2000 -- because he is impervious to the Shawnee Curse (not being elected in a zero-ending year).

However, I am concerned about one thing: even if the synodic Jupiter-Venus air conjunction of 1980-81 had something to do with preventing the death by assassination of Ronald Reagan, how do we know another president doesn't have to make up for it's failure somehow? If that is true, Clinton may still be assassinated this year.  Even if he is, as mind-boggling and unprecedented as it may sound, the 2000-elect will also be assassinated or die in office (two presidents dead in consecutive terms).'


Superpower leaders throughout history have always seemed to be drawn towards the paranormal.  Perhaps somebody in the Chief of Staff's office is also watching the Base 7 calendar and Nostradamus' predictions.  Maybe they're reading your page!  :)

Now Jim quotes me again from my first letter:

'However, you may have not noticed on my Year 2000 (Part Two) page that another Western world leader is in danger this year. I have predicted a potential assassination of either British Prime Minister Tony Blair or one of three British royals -- Prince Philip, Prince Charles, or Prince Andrew. The vector of danger is September 2000. The assassins (or would-be assassins if they hopefully fail) will either be members of the IRA or an IRA splinter group or international terrorists.'

Is it possible that an attempted assassination against PM Blair might be made by the Serbian Secret Service (if there *is* such a thing..)? Remember last year during the Allied bombing campaign during the Kosovo Crisis, that PM Blair was advocating positioning hundreds of thousands of Allied ground forces in Albania for an invasion of Kosovo.  If war breaks out between Serbia and Montenegro (or Vojvodina or Croatia or Bosnia...) and Blair makes another stand like that, it might be conceivable he might find himself on a hit list in Belgrade.  And the Serbians do have some experience in assassinating world leaders (1914).....

'b) Remember that my vectors are not always reliable. 69% to 87% of my predictions have occurred during the years I have specified, however only roughly half of the vectors (specific months) have been correct. For example, I predicted that the earthquakes in Turkey and Greece would occur in March and May 1999, but instead they occurred in August and September 1999. The prediction I made -- which was unusual because major quakes in Greece are rare and major quakes in both Turkey and Greece so close together are even more rare -- was correct and the year was correct, but the specific vectors were off by a factor of three months.'

That's still impressive nailing the correct year.  :)  I didn't know earthquakes for Greece were real rare, since Greece is on the border area between the Eurasian and African Plates, halfway between Italy and all its volcanoes and the northern Middle East, which always seems to have earthquakes.

'The New York City/East Coast prediction was very difficult to make without generalising. SOMETHING terrible was certainly indicated for New York City, the US East Coast, or the former Soviet Union (but which?). The time window we are in is exactly seven years after the World Trade Centre Bombing, fourteen years after the Chernobyl Disaster, twenty-one years after the Three Mile Island nuclear disaster, and thirty-five years after the Great Blackout of New York City (that, technically, was November 1965 and may still bode ill for this November). In 1972, twenty-eight years ago, I...'

Notice that with the exception of the World Trade Center, all of these misfortunes were in the power industry.  Maybe we can narrow it down to something involving a major power grid collapse or nuclear meltdown, rather than a war or meteor impact.

'...believe it was in May, an asteroid or a very large meteor narrowly missed colliding with the earth in the eastern United States (I have seen the film footage of the fireball); however, it managed to burn up over the Atlantic Ocean before an impact could occur. With the one exception, Chernobyl, the eastern US was the focus of all of these events.'

The famous 1972 film was shot in Wyoming, but the fireball was heading east and would have had a major impact (pun intended) on the Eastern U.S. had it not burned up.

'Also, Nostradamus is quite clear that New York City will experience two cataclysmic disasters: one that will bring partial destruction to the city as well as portions of New Jersey, another that will completely incinerate the Big Apple. Even Edgar Cayce concurs that New York, Connecticut, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, and other coastal states will be partially (and permanently) inundated by unprecedented flooding sometime after 1998. All of his earth changes are projected to be completed by mid-21st century.'

I don't place a lot of trust in Edgar Cayce, but that's just my own personal opinion.  I don't doubt that something will happen to devastate New York.  The Long Island Fault hasn't popped since the 1700s...it's gotta be overdue by now (I do recall somewhere you have an earthquake forecast for Boston or Buffalo, but I don't remember when).

Flooding to the Northeast after 1998?  Hmmmm......Hurricane Floyd brought some pretty bad flooding to the Northeast in 1999.  Granted, it wasn't permanent, but still...


'Still, getting the year right is difficult enough. I grew weary of all the astrologers, psychics, and prophets (including the late Jeane Dixon) who used to make New Year's predictions for each coming year on television and in newspapers.  None of them rarely if ever committed themselves to any specific month or season. The following year we would check their score and it would always fall somewhere between 0 to 10% (often 0).'

Yup.  Agreed.

'I also plainly state my predictions in words that are understandable to most people. Unlike another more popular prophet who is highly visible on the Internet and claims he predicted Princess Diana's death way back in 1995, I do not resort to an arcane or intentionally obscure form of 'mystical verse' smothered in symbolism and metaphor -- a Rorschach blot grammatically constructed in such a way that it can be interpreted a hundred different ways and be 'proven' correct no matter what happens. To a somewhat lesser extent, I could accuse Nostradamus of doing the very same thing in a number of his quatrains.'

Yeah, that's something that impressed me about your page and what sorta "sucked me in" to reading yours rather than just dismissing it as another prophecy page where anybody can read into the predictions anything they want to.  I agree to an extent with what you said about Nostradamus.....his public image took a big hit when July 1999 passed without a major disaster happening.  I personally think the "king of terror" is either the bombing campaign in Kosovo, the destruction of Chechnya, or something still to come ("1999 and 7 months" could mean 1999 *plus* 7 months), but the press made it out to be nuclear war/comet impact/alien invasion/second coming of Christ.  Nostradamus was certainly fuzzy and that fuzziness contributed to last summer's fiasco.  Of course, he had to be fuzzy to avoid being arrested as a witch...

'(I should point out that I am experimenting with new sound and letter systems to try to identify which celebrities are at risk of death or mishap. But I explain how these systems function and what they are based on -- I do not leave it to the imagination of the viewer. I also should warn that these systems are HIGHLY EXPERIMENTAL. 1999 -- the 'More and F' prediction -- was my first trial run.)'

OK, I have the obvious question here.  Wars, meteorological disasters, political assassinations, famines...these are important events, and if anything's going to be able to be predicted, it's going to be events that are going to affect the energies of millions of people and create definite ripples in the continuum.  But celebrities???  Please don't take this the wrong way, but....who cares?  If Madonna or Demi Moore dies, the only people affected are Madonna or Demi Moore.  No big changes to the space-time continuum, no changes in the energies of millions of people. I wonder if attempting to predict trivial events might diminish your claim.  After all, there are enough people named Moore in the world that there are quite a few Moores who die or are in the news every day.

I may be in the minority here, and I hope I don't offend you by saying this, but I also put Princess Diana and the whole Royal Family in the "trivial celebrity" category.  It was tragic that she died the way she did, but I don't really see any effect her life or death has had on the world.  But maybe that's because I'm just a chauvinistic American...:)

BTW, I noticed you use the British spellings of words like favourite and colour in your pages, so I assume you're either British or live somewhere in the Commonwealth.  So I hope you're not offended by my referring to the Royal Family as "trivial."  But certainly, the history of the U.K. in this century has been determined by people with the names of George and Chamberlain and Churchill and Macmillan and Thatcher and Blair, not anybody named Windsor.


'7) Unfortunately, July/August 2000 is the vector for the Olympics Terrorist Attack prediction. However, after reading what I have said about vectors, it should be apparent that September 15 is close enough. I mean, if it happens on September 22, would you really say my prediction was WRONG because it didn't happen in August? Remember what I said about expectations of psychics' and prophets' New Year's predictions. Just getting the year right is difficult enough.'

When it comes to the Olympics....nah, the year's pretty easy.  Only happens once every 4 years.  :)  I'm just kidding....seriously, though, if the vector for July/August extends into September, and it's logically not possible to have an Olympic attack before September, then why not just say September?  I guess an August attack is possible in qualifying events or the trans-Australia torch run, but that'd be kinda anti-climactic....why go for these little things when you can make a big splash in Sydney a month later?

'8) We'll see on the Israeli-Syrian peace. There is an interesting contradiction: influences suggest a successful peace accord for Syria and Israel in September 2000 (I should also add, however, that this is also when a new peace accord between Israel and the PLO is now scheduled to be signed, so perhaps not). But next year, in 2001, influences are highly adverse around October/November, indicating war beginning between Israel and Syria, perhaps in the Golan Heights or elsewhere along the Israeli-Syrian border. Things progress from bad to even worse around April 2002 when the entire Middle East may become a huge battleground and Israel is invaded and conquered by an Iraqi-led coalition.'

Influences for peace followed quickly by war are nothing new in the Middle East.  How long did it take for Iraq and the U.S. to turn from allies in the struggle against Iran into bitter enemies over the invasion of Kuwait?  I think the only nation in the Middle East that Israel can trust is Jordan, and that only as long as the current dynasty is in power.  I hope that King Abdullah surivives the assassination attempt, if it occurs.

'10) St. Malachy is about the only ancient prophet who does not appear to concur with Nostradamus. According to Malachy, as you have pointed out, there should be only two more popes after John Paul II. However, Nostradamus describes the careers and deaths of many popes who have never reigned. For example I know of no pope who reigned for many years who had a nephew who later became pope himself. The nephew pope is later murdered by an evil cardinal and his followers. The evil cardinal then becomes pope himself. I know of no pope who ever died in Reggio at the time a strange celestial object appeared in the heavens. I know of no pope who reigned for only seven months and was killed by invading Albanian armies. I know of no pope who died during a major deluge in France in December and with him the Catholic faith itself.

The list goes on and on -- each pope somehow different and unique. Some have reigned, but many have not.

I, at least, feel that we can dispense with St. Malachy's prophecies (or dispense with Nostradamus' -- their predictions simply do NOT concur). Then again, perhaps Malachy could not see beyond 'Peter, the Roman,' mistakenly believing him to be the final end-of-time pope.'


I can't imagine the Catholic Church dying in the next few decades, so it's most likely that the latter is true.  Once again, this is another prophecy that the public has twisted and added to the common myths of the millennium (like the "king of terror" prophecy).

Once again, thanks for writing me back, and I appreciate you taking the time to discuss things with somebody who's fascinated by history, both past and future.  :)

---

Jim

 

 

 


The ABM Treaty and the Future of US-Russian Relations
-----Original Message-----
From:
Jim
To: mmcclellan@adelphia.net <mmcclellan@adelphia.net>
Date: Friday, June 09, 2000 3:03 PM
Subject: Re: Nostradamus and the New Prophecy Almanacs Newsletter


I was reminded in your newsletter that this year is the 28th anniversary of the ABM treaty between the U.S. and the Soviet Union.  There's been a lot of talk in the news about altering the ABM treaty or finaggling a way around the end of the treaty to allow the U.S. to build a space-based missile defense system (publicly to defend us against North Korea, though I think Russia and China are bigger threats).  Predictably, Russia is 100% against such a system, and it dominated much of the recent summit between Presidents Clinton and Putin.  President Clinton, Vice-President Gore, and Gov. Bush are all in favor of such a neo-"Star Wars" system.

What are your thoughts on how the changes in the ABM climate will affect U.S.-Russia relations, especially if Pres. Putin is overthrown?

I think it's eerie that this is the first time the ABM treaty has really been re-examined, 28 years (a multiple of 7) after it was ratified...

---

Jim
* * * * *
I have always had a 'low-level' awareness that the ABM Treaty was signed in 1972 ever since the event took place.  This awareness of historical events -- a 'not letting go of things' and keeping them compartmentalised in my head as opposed to recalling events that have been 'forgotten' (memory, in other words) -- is what I draw on before I have to crack history books or encyclopedias for historical information I have either truly forgotten, vaguely remember, or never knew about to begin with.

I agree, the resurrection of the ABM treaty issue is eerie (and also proves my system does have its merits).

I was considering posting a generalised prediction that the ABM treaty might be an issue this summer, but didn't after I discovered that it was already being discussed and speculated about by some news services like Stratfor.com.  You see, if I discover that a development I am about to predict is already being predicted by news organisations and 'think tanks' I don't bother.  It would be too easy for a potential detractor to use this against me ('McClellan gets his ideas from Stratfor.com, etc.').

However, if I make a prediction and then afterwards discover that news groups or 'think tanks' are also making a similar prediction -- well, that's too bad.  What is important to me is that I am thinking of it on my own without any outside contamination.

What you are saying about Russia being 100% against any form of ABM system is true.  And experts believe that if the US goes ahead with it that Russia will scrap all arms reductions agreements and a new arms race and a new Cold War will begin.

In my view, if the influence from 1972 were to completely win out, the US would end up backing out of the idea and choose not to deploy an ABM system.

However, there is a counter-influence from 1983 indicating that a neo-'Star Wars' system, as you call it, will be put in place in March 2004 (I have had this prediction posted for some time on the Early 21st Century: 2003 - 2012 page). I believe that even if the US chooses not to deploy ABM systems this year, events in 2001 or 2002 will force the American president to re-consider and push the bill through Congress.

I have long believed (since June 1998) that George W. Bush will be the next US president.  Now that he has announced that Henry Kissinger will play an important role in his cabinet I find it difficult to see what Gore can possibly do to offset Bush's rising popularity.  The issue this year is foreign affairs (especially in regards to the US-Russian 'relationship' and China-Taiwan relations), not the economy, therefore I believe people will feel that a vote for Bush is a vote for Kissinger. This will be a wise choice for it requires 'the master of foreign policy', Henry Kissinger, to guide the world through the extremely troubled times I see immediately ahead of us.

Obviously under a Republican administration, some form of ABM defence will be created -- eventually moving from sea-based missiles to simplified versions of the particle laser beam satellites proposed in 1983.

I believe that by the time of the US election in November, US-Russian relations will be quite frightening and unstable.  Since I have had a long-standing prediction on my web site that there will be a second Russian revolution (a bloody and violent one) in September/October 2000 I have to conclude that Putin is going to mess up somehow.  Perhaps he will become too dictatorial, another economic crisis will occur, or he will involve Russia in a war that the public will not support.  The alternative to Putin, I am afraid, will not be much better: someone like Communist Party boss Gennady Zyuganov, former general-turned-governor Alexander Lebed, or ultranationalist Vladimir Zhirinovsky.

Is it possible the ABM Treaty controversy may play a role in provoking a revolution instead?

Consider what might happen if Putin changes his mind and agrees to some form of compromise with the US.  He would be branded a 'traitor' in the Duma.  He might be forced to dissolve Parliament leaving the door open for a hothead like Zhirinovsky to declare himself the true president of Russia and stage a rebellion against the government.

On the other hand, if the US does not back down from ratifying an ABM system, he could scrap all arms agreements and begin a dangerous nuclear arms race.  If Russians are terrified at the prospect of a new, more dangerous Cold War with the US, this could give someone in the Duma an opportunity to start a rebellion against the government 'in the name of restoring good relations with the US.'

I may be wrong, but Vladimir Putin does not 'look' or 'feel' like a long-term leader like   Breshnev, Gorbachev, or Yeltsin.  He 'looks' like a puppet who is doing what he has been told to do.

However, if this entire year does play out exactly like 1972 in regards to US-Russian relations, Putin will be in Russia to stay and a false peace will continue between the two nuclear powers until a crisis undermines it in autumn 2001.

The year 2000 is filled with all sorts of contradictory influences from past years (1993, 1986, 1979, 1972, 1965, 1958, and 1951).  That is what makes prediction using the base 7 system for THIS year so very difficult.

Thanks for writing, Jim.

If you can think of anything that might be of help or a perspective I perhaps have not considered, please do write again.

Kind regards,


Michael


mmcclellan@adelphia.net

Note that red text below is excerpted from my remarks in the above correspondence. Jim is responding to my remarks point-by-point. -- MM.


-----Original Message-----
From:
Jim
To: mmcclellan@adelphia.net <mmcclellan@adelphia.net>
Date: Sunday, June 11, 2000 1:55 AM
Subject: Re: Nostradamus and the New Prophecy Almanacs Newsletter


Thanks for your speedy reply!  It's one thing to see history happening; it's another to analyze what it all might mean, and to prove that history does repeat itself.


I have long believed (since June 1998) that George W. Bush will be the next US president.  Now that he has announced that Henry Kissinger will play an important role in his cabinet I find it difficult to see what Gore can possibly do to offset Bush's rising popularity.  The issue this year is foreign affairs (especially in regards to the US-Russian 'relationship' and China-Taiwan relations), not the economy, therefore I believe people will feel that a vote for Bush is a vote for Kissinger. This will be a wise choice for it requires 'the master of foreign policy', Henry Kissinger, to guide the world through the extremely troubled times I see immediately ahead of us.

I hadn't heard about Henry Kissinger.  Talk about shades of 1972 repeating themselves.  I wasn't aware that Kissinger was that highly regarded.  True, he got America out of the Vietnam War and won the Nobel Peace Prize for that.  But he also presided over the disaster of the Saigon Evacuation in 1975.  And I don't know that anybody associated with the Nixon Administration escaped Watergate completely unscathed.

I doubt Dr. Kissinger would accept another appointment at Secretary of State, especially at his stage.  He might be another "elder statesman," like his old boss, President Nixon.  Most talk I have heard about the Secretary of State's job have centered around retired Gen. Colin Powell, who himself seems receptive to a Cabinet position (as long as it's not the Vice-President's job).  What do you think of Gen. Powell?  I like him as a person, but I worry that a "Powell Doctrine" foreign policy would allow China to aggressively pursue its dream of being a superpower (since there's no way America could ever stand up to China in the way that the Powell Doctrine requires).  That's big trouble for Taiwan.


Obviously under a Republican administration, some form of ABM defence will be created -- eventually moving from sea-based missiles to simplified versions of the particle laser beam satellites proposed in 1983.

The quicker we get away from sea-based missiles, the better.  I still don't see North Korea as a serious threat.  Not with starving troops, desperately poor civilians, a lack of support from China and Russia, and 650,000 South Korean and U.S. troops on their southern border.

I believe that by the time of the US election in November, US-Russian relations will be quite frightening and unstable.  Since I have had a long-standing prediction on my web site that there will be a second Russian revolution (a bloody and violent one) in September/October 2000 I have to conclude that Putin is going to mess up somehow.  Perhaps he will become too dictatorial, another economic crisis will occur, or he will involve Russia in a war that the public will not support.  The alternative to Putin, I am afraid, will not be much better: someone like Communist Party boss Gennady Zyuganov, former general-turned-governor Alexander Lebed, or ultranationalist Vladimir Zhirinovsky.

The war will be Chechnya.  Watch my word.  The Russian TV has been very supportive of the war in Chechnya, downplaying the carnage waged by both sides.  The media is finicky, though, and if Putin loses the support of the Russian media, they may begin to broadcast the truth about Chechnya. And that may cost Putin just as Afghanistan cost Gorbachev.

Is it possible the ABM Treaty controversy may play a role in provoking a revolution instead?

Probably not.  Any revolution has to be supported by the people (as the coup leaders in 1991 learned to their dismay).  The ABM Treaty is nothing concrete, based on a possibility (a nuclear exchange) that most people are in denial about.  Diplomats may be passionate about the ABM Treaty, but common people won't.  There needs to be something concrete (like body bags coming home from Chechnya) that people can feel passionate about.

Consider what might happen if Putin changes his mind and agrees to some form of compromise with the US.  He would be branded a 'traitor' in the Duma. He might be forced to dissolve Parliament leaving the door open for a hothead like Zhirinovsky to declare himself the true president of Russia and stage a rebellion against the government.

On the other hand, if the US does not back down from ratifying an ABM system, he could scrap all arms agreements and begin a dangerous nuclear arms race.  If Russians are terrified at the prospect of a new, more dangerous Cold War with the US, this could give someone in the Duma an opportunity to start a rebellion against the government 'in the name of restoring good relations with the US.'


The first paragraph about Putin being branded a traitor and Zhrinovsky coming to power....isn't that exactly word-for-word what happened to Gorbachev in August 1991?  That "revolution" wasn't exactly effective.

I may be wrong, but Vladimir Putin does not 'look' or 'feel' like a long-term leader like Breshnev, Gorbachev, or Yeltsin.  He 'looks' like a puppet who is doing what he has been told to do.

Agreed.  Putin is a former KGB agent who was stationed for much of his career in East Germany.  Pure technocrat.  Technocrats can serve as caretaker leaders, but they don't have the vision to be popular in the long term.  George Bush was a technocrat who won the Gulf War, but couldn't compete against the vision offered by Bill Clinton.  And Bush was a spy, just like Putin.

Hmmm.....who could be Russia's Bill Clinton?


However, if this entire year does play out exactly like 1972 in regards to US-Russian relations, Putin will be in Russia to stay and a false peace will continue between the two nuclear powers until a crisis undermines it in autumn 2001.

The year 2000 is filled with all sorts of contradictory influences from past years (1993, 1986, 1979, 1972, 1965, 1958, and 1951).  That is what makes prediction using the base 7 system for THIS year so very difficult.


One more influence:  1944.  Last week, on the 56th anniversary of D-Day, a museum to memorialize the invasion was opened in New Orleans.  Why the 56th anniversary, instead of the 50th or 55th or 60th anniversaries? Hmmmm.....56 is divisible by 7....

Thanks for writing, Jim.

If you can think of anything that might be of help or a perspective I perhaps have not considered, please do write again.

And thank you for always providing perspectives I have not considered!

BTW, I've been thinking more about that flood prediction for this summer that you made, and I realized something that sent shivers down my spine. Not only is this year the 7th anniversary of the devastating 1993 floods in the Midwest, but it's also the 63rd anniversary of 1937.  When I was a kid, growing up in Indiana, all the old-timers had stories about the Flood of '37, even 40 years after the event.  The amount of the damage was staggering....my home county of Vanderburgh County, IN, was over half-submerged by the Ohio River, which broke previous flood records by over 20 feet.  I can dig out a book downstairs about the flood if you're interested in the numbers.

So it looks like 2000 could be hit by the double whammy of 1993 and 1937, if the base-7 system influence works all the way to 63 years...

---

Jim

* * * * *

Hi Jim!

Regarding Kissinger:  George W. Bush has been careful not to say in what capacity he will be using some of the key people he has chosen.  I wish I could remember the others, but I found Kissinger's inclusion and his appearance with the Bush group on the television news rather startling to say the least.  But it is far from certain that he will be designated as Secretary of State. Obviously, at the very least, he will function in some advisory capacity since George W. admits that if he (Bush) doesn't have all the answers where foreign affairs are concerned, the 'expert' members of his staff will.

As for Colin Powell, I'm not so sure that with him in Bush's cabinet the US would fear launching an 'Operation Pacific Storm' or 'Operation Pacific Typhoon.' I have to wonder what Nostradamus had in mind when he predicted that 'in the East there will be great fear and dread' around the time of an election or inauguration of a major world leader.  Or, more specifically, 'after the naval combat, the Red Adversary will become pale with fear, putting the Great Ocean to terror.'

I agree that an unpopular war would be the likeliest cause of Putin's downfall.  However, since Russia is still at war in Chechnya, and rebels are launching attacks in Grozny, and body bags are already being seen on Moscow TV, my guess is that the war would have to evolve into something much worse -- something that would resemble the quagmire Afghanistan was.  I have a prediction that Russia will extend the war in Chechnya to neighbouring Georgia by October 2000.


I also have projected that Russia will be locked into a major conflict with an alliance led by Iran that will include Azerbaijan, Turkmenistan, Afghanistan, Armenia, the northern Kurds, Georgia, and the southern Russian republics by December 2001.  Perhaps we will begin seeing the current war shifting in that direction before the end of THIS year (especially, if Russia invades Georgia in September or October).

There have been two failed coups or revolts:  the three-day coup you mentioned that occurred in August 1991 and the September/October 1993 'Crisis in Moscow' revolution led by former Vice President Alexander Rutskoi.  Rutskoi and the Russian Parliament (which Yeltsin had declared an 'outlaw' parliament and officially dissolved) had just enough public support to keep the world on edge for well over a three weeks.  In this situation you had an armed resistance movement at war with pro-government forces.  One of the more memorable bloodbaths occurred outside the headquarters of the Russian television station in Ostankino.  The following day Yeltsin declared martial law and Russian tanks rolled into Moscow and destroyed much of the 'Russian White House' where Rutskoi and his supporters were based, while pro-Yeltsin troops engaged in firefights with the resistance.

In my mind the 1993 crisis was far more dangerous than the 1991 coup.  You could see the nervousness on Clinton's face as he attempted to play down the events unfolding in Moscow.  Many foreign policy experts voiced their anxieties about what would happen to Russia's nuclear arsenal if the rebellion spread throughout the provinces.  The U.S. was forced to be placed on a state of nuclear alert until the crisis was resolved.

I have never ceased to be haunted by the images of what occurred during the final days of September and early days of October 1993. I can't help but to believe that the 'next time' something like this happens, it will be 1917 all over again -- only worse.

Russia's Bill Clinton?  Well if its a sex-crazed buffoon you are looking for who would love an opportunity to show off his country's military muscle I would suggest Vladimir Zhirinovsky (whose antics, tantrums, and involvements with Italian porn starlets and other acts of licentious behaviour are well-known). Even though he has uttered threats against various countries that verge on the apocalyptic, from a Russian man-in-the street perspective, he is just another 'good ol' boy' like Clinton (who has uttered his own share of apocalyptic- sounding threats, i.e., 'North Korea will cease to exist' (1994).

As for the base 7 system reaching back farther than 49 (7 x 7) years, it certainly can.  However, I find that the influences get weaker the farther back one goes prior to 49 years -- unless a thread of recurrence is established at fairly frequent intervals of 7 or 14.  Look at the Marilyn Monroe/blonde celeb tragedy line for example:

Actress Carole Landis (a blonde) commits suicide by an overdose of Seconal on July 5, 1948; seven years later James Dean (blonde and only male on the line) is killed during a car crash on September 30, 1955; seven years later Marilyn Monroe (artifical blonde) dies under mysterious circumstances (suicide?) on August 4, 1962; seven years later Sharon Tate (blonde) murdered by Manson family on August 15, 1969; thirteen years later (off by one year from being 2 x 7 - what I call an adjacent repetition) Princess Grace of Monaco (Grace Kelly - blonde) dies of a stroke while driving on September 14, 1982; the following year (what would have been 2 x 7 years after the death of Sharon Tate) an IRA terrorist abandons a plot to murder Princess Diana and Prince Charles with a bomb while they are attending a Duran Duran concert in 1983 (he confesses this in a televised interview in December 1996); and finally, fourteen years later, Diana (an artificial blonde) dies in car crash on August 31, 1997.  Now if we can say that actress Carol Lombard's death in a plane crash in January 1942 was only off by four or five months from the July-September 1941 vector, we have a line of tragic blonde celebrities, all female save for James Dean, reaching out over a period of 56 years.

What are the 'odds' against this happening I wonder?

Anyway, I broached the subject of how far back one might be able to go with another visitor named Christopher (I think this post is still in the Email Forum archives [1] or [2]).  I noted that if you take the line from the death of Princess Diana all the way back to Marie Antoinette (who also died in Paris) one gets 29.142857 x 7 years.  So it starts to break down eventually.

Also, extremely powerful events may have an impact 63, 70, 77, 84, 91, 98, etc. years later. Technically, the three wars fought in Yugoslavia and the former Yugoslavia began with the Serbo-Croat War of 1991.  If there is ever a third World War in Europe anytime soon, it will likely begin, at least in part, because of events in the Balkans.  Note that World War I (1914) and the beginning of the Yugoslav Wars (1991) are exactly 77 years apart (7 x 11).

Double-whammies

You mention a potential double whammy from 1937 and 1993 regarding the Midwest Flood prediction.  Double whammies, even triple whammies, however, do not always guarantee an event will occur.

Here's a good double whammy:

1950 Korean War  1964 Vietnam   1999 China - didn't happen and doesn't look like it will.  I've been predicting a war between China and Taiwan that will involve the US in a Sino-US war since June of 1999.  Relations have been tense off and on since 1996.  The double whammy Korea/Vietnam seemed like a sure bet.  Seems like it should have happened by now.  May 2000 at the latest (matching the May 1965 deployment of 50,000 US troops to South Vietnam).

Oh, yes, by the way any information about the 1937 flood would be of interest.  Of course, if 1937 impacts then another Jean Harlow may die.

Jim, hope you found some of this of interest.  I'm currently working on a base 7 numerology page -- one that makes the system more easy to understand (with charts too).  What I may do is create special email forum pages to link to that page when it is done -- for those who wish to investigate the intricacies of it further.  I'll be moving any base 7 related correspondences now on the other Email Forum pages to those pages.

Thanks for writing and please don't hestitate to write again.

Kind regards,


Michael

 

 

 


Terrorist Attack in London, My Prediction Concerning Possible
Assassination of British Royal or PM in August/September
-----Original Message-----
From:
Gary
To: Mike <mmcclellan@adelphia.net>
Date: Wednesday, July 19, 2000 6:39 PM
Subject: Hi again

Interesting events in London today that I thought you might be interested in. It was the Queen Mother's birthday pagent and terrorists, believed to be a splinter Irish Republican group are being blamed.
Thought you might be interested as your original prophecy was a terrorist attack in London and I believe you also suggested a Royal family involvement in another prophecy.  
Best Regards  
Gary

* * * * *

Hi Gary,
Thanks for bringing the matter today to my attention.  It did not go unnoticed by me, however.
Before going on about events in London, let me first do some clarifying regarding the two prophecies:
One prophecy is that either a member of the British royal family or Prime Minister Tony Blair and family are in danger of assassination in August/September. I speculated that the IRA, an IRA splinter group, or even international terrorists may be involved. No location is specified.
The other prophecy concerns international terrorism in Sydney, Australia in September during the Olympic Games.
I have tied the two together with an update (although they are not necessarily linked), speculating that perhaps some of the royals and/or the PM and his family may be harmed or killed by international terrorists should they attend the Sydney Olympics in September.
Just my way of being helpful.  There may be no linkage between the two predictions whatsoever.
Now, regarding the events today.
I thought about it, but technically none of the devices that went off or were found were anywhere close to where the Queen Mother's birthday pagent was held.  The key passage in the article that connects the two events is this:
'The organizers of a pageant to be held later on Wednesday for the centenary of the Queen Mother -- mother of Queen Elizabeth and widow of her predecessor King George VI -- said the device was aimed at disrupting their celebrations.'
One can create a psychological link regarding the TIMING of the two events, but that is all.
But THAT is enough.  As we draw nearer the August/September vector, this is the second significant event that is in some way related to my prophecy concerning the royals or the PM.  As was the case with the assassination of British diplomat Stephen Saunders in June, I believe what occurred in London today may be yet another warning that things may be moving in the direction I fear.
It is also possible that today's events establish the location of the potential assassination:  England, or more specifically London, rather than Australia or elsewhere.
The whole affair is a bit frightening wouldn't you agree?
Let us hope that today's events will give both the royal family and the British prime minister (or any other high ranking British official too, such as London Mayor Ken Livingstone) some pause to reconsider their overall security arrangements and to avoid engaging in any reckless actions that could leave them vulnerable in the near future.
Thanks again for writing.  Please feel to write again.
Kind regards,
 

Michael

-----Original Message-----
From:
Gary
To: Mike <mmcclellan@adelphia.net>
Date: Thursday, July 20, 2000 5:36 PM
Subject: Re: Hi again

Thanks for the reply. You've gone up even further in my estimation by not taking this as a partially correct hit, but interesting close all the same. Especially with the Queen Mother viewed as a sort of hero by her generation for refusing to evacuate from London during the Blitz.
I heard on a BBC radio interview that a clued-up journalist on Irish affairs had heard that this was only a training exercise. Pretty impresive training exercise causing widespread disruption in London. Hate to think what a real attack would be like. Police also recovered a missile launcher recently allegedly capable of taking out anything that the police/army currently have in Ireland. They didn't recover the warhead (s). I wonder whether Ken Livingstone would be a target. You might not be aware that in the past he has openly courted the IRA, even inviting banned Sein Fein (the IRA political wing) to attend as guests at Westminister when they were banned. The only difference with this Irish group is that it might not be an official IRA terrorist cell. Certainly as you say a frightening state of affairs.   Gary

 

 

 


Dreams of Asteroids or Martian Debris, Applying Base 7 to Your Personal Life

-----Original Message-----
From:
Tom
To: mmcclellan@adelphia.net <mmcclellan@adelphia.net>
Date: Monday, August 21, 2000 5:58 PM
Subject: A question about a dream.

First of all, I just wanted to say how extrordinary your site is and how much you wrote and put into it. As for the question, I either had 6 or 7 dreams about a red asteroid, planet, or moon. The next dream that I had again and again, it was the same thing, but the dark red objects were increasing in size. All were red but the final one was a dim brown. I'm not sure if this is a revelation or ending of a dream, or just a beginning of a revelation. I kept it away from me. All the dreams, until one day....

I won't mention who it is, but someone dear to me died not too long after a red moon was seen by many people last year. The moon was perfect red according to those many people. Could there be any connection with the red moon and my 6 or 7 dreams I had. I believe it was 7 dreams. The loved one sadly passed away at age 42 I think she was. I started thinking, if I add the year she was born by sevens, it would go like this, 7, 14, 21, 28, 35, 42. I figured this number chain on what I read about the number seven.

Well Michael, it was a pleasure writing to you and I hope this may give not just you, but me a possible answer. Take care of yourself, and don't blame yourself for what you predict. Think of it as preparing for the worst, yet preparing in silence.

Thank you Michael.


Tom

* * * * *

Hello Tom,

Thanks for your comments on the web site -- I hope to expand the site's focus much more in the months ahead.

I am, of course, aware of the controversy concerning Comet 76P, Mars, and Phobos.  It is not impossible that your dreams concerning the red objects are visions of Martian fragments approaching earth.  The final, dim brown object, may be the moon Phobos.  I would consider these dreams revelatory; however, if you have been accutely aware of the controversy, these dreams could be a product of anxiety.

Incidentally, if your dreams are precognitive, I don't think they will cease after seven occurrences.  You will likely continue to experience them periodically until the event itself finally takes place.

The red moon you speak of appeared in January 2000; there was a total lunar eclipse at that time.  If your dreams can be traced back to January, then it is possible that they were either triggered by intrigue over the red moon phenomenon or that you were experiencing revelatory visions about what an increasing number of people believe will happen this autumn: that fragments from Mars and/or the Martian moon Phobos are on a collision course with earth due to an ALLEGED comet impact with Mars sometime around June 3.

IF this scenario IS true, I very much fear we will not know for certain about it until it is too late.  To the best of my knowledge Mars will not be visible to the naked eye until October (some say early October, some say late October).

I cannot recall how many times over the years (and still) I have had a lucid dream about a planet, planetoid, or rogue moon (extremely large asteroids used to be called planetoids) -- something that should not be there -- looming over the treetops and housetops in the night sky.  Sometimes red, but usually dark brown or dark plum.  You can make out features, markings on the surface of it a bit like the moon, but not quite as vivid.

Back in 1995, I had one very lucid and protracted dream of what I took to be an asteroid passing over us in the night, barely detectable from the horizon at first, then getting larger and larger but not very bright (dark brownish and oblong) as it passed overhead, then diminishing in size as it approached the opposite horizon.  I believe I was in southern France in the dream because there were French and French Arabs sitting drinking cocktails at our table in an open amphitheatre. Then came the sound of sirens from a nearby US air base and army vehicles were hurtling toward us. A soldier or officer told me to get in a jeep, that we had to hurry before the shock wave reached us.  I think we only had five or ten minutes to make the airport.  Then I woke up.

I turned this dream into a poem and it is at my web site on the last Dream Window of the 2003-2012 page dealing with a possible 2008 collision with asteroid Toutatis.

However, it need not apply to that event.  It could be another event that will happen sooner.

I am reminded that a Catholic prophet who calls himself 'the Little Pebble' has predicted that three large Martian fragments will strike earth in October or November.  One will strike the American northwest, another (the worst one according to him) will impact off the coast of Australia, and another will strike France.

I find the French connection quite troubling SINCE I DREAMT OF AN IMPACT IN FRANCE over five years ago!  (thus far, dreams I have had that have come true have taken anywhere from three hours to six years to do so).

I am sorry to hear of your loss.  I really cannot say whether this person's death had anything to do with your dreams.  Of course, NOT EVERYONE DIES in multiples of 7 years.  People will die at age 29, 34, 47, 55, 69, etc. However, if there IS a thread running through one's life at more or less every seven years, it may help to be cautious.

Case in point:  I had an auto accident in December 1977, due, in part, to recklessness on my part.  I suffered a head injury and completely demolished my car.  Would I suffer the same fate 7 years later, in 1984?  No.  In 1991? No.  But I had a feeling I had better be careful in 1998.  I had a feeling the late 1970s were playing out again in a different way.

In September 1998 I was out walking dogs with a friend and we took them to let them burrow their noses into the dirt on some hills of excavated earth. After climbing to the top of one hill, I foolishly decided to scale a plot of earth and sod that was a bit higher up.  I ascended, looked around, then took a short jump back to where I had been.  My feet slid on the loose dirt and I found myself pitching forward.  Reaching out at empty air, I had nothing to break my fall and fell headlong down the slope landing on my stomach.  I slid quite some distance that way until I stopped -- just a few metres short of a wooden stake pointed at my face and some large rocks. There were abrasions on my legs, feet, and abdomen.  I went to the emergency room to have a tetanus shot after I cleaned the wounds with hydrogen peroxide.

I was lucky.  It could have been much, much worse.

I was so busy looking for a car wreck to happen, that I never gave a thought to the idea that some OTHER sort of accident could occur.  It also  happened a little less than three months prematurely, the vector being December. And, just as with 1977, the accident had been due to recklessness on my part.

So look closely at your life and be careful -- if you can!  Remember things do not repeat EXACTLY when they do repeat -- it's always a little different each time, a variation on a theme.

And perhaps some things we simply cannot change, even with foreknowledge.

Again, thanks for your comments on the web site and for writing.  Please feel free to write again if you have other questions.


Warm regards,

Michael


mmcclellan@adelphia.net

http://www.geocities.com/Athens/Atrium/3933

 

 

 


The Great War, The Balkans, The Antichrist Union, What Nostradamus Intended,
the Current and Future Role of Iraq and Libya, the Cycles of Seven,
the Future Church of Diana, and Hybrid Humans with Pig Genes
-----Original Message-----
From:
Thaddius
To: mmcclellan@adelphia.net <mmcclellan@adelphia.net>
Date: Wednesday, September 13, 2000 7:45 PM
Subject: Re: Nostradamus and the New Prophecy Almanacs Newsletter

Thank You so much for the information.  I really think you are on to something.  Everything you touched upon is very similar to what I have been saying for almost 2 years.  When I read a book interpreting Nostradamus I approach it completely differently than most and yet we both reached many of the same conclusions. 
For instance when you talk about the Balkans, absolutely true they will be responsible for the next great war.  The only difference is that I believe that we have been in World War III now for almost 85 yrs. Keep in mind that Nostradamus was able to look into man's timeline from outside of it, so its not inconceivable that what seems as seperate WW's in our time could be seen from outside of context as battles of an even greater war.  The impression I got from Nostradamus was that the last great war of mankind would last for 135yrs.  There would be 3 major battles in this war.  The first two would occur very close to each other (WW I & WW II) and the third would come after a few decades of relative peace.  I believe he warns us that the great nations from the West would be victorious in the first two battles but that the third would be a close call.  He clearly indicates that they all would spring forth from the Balkans (The Black Ravens/Kosovo!)  He says that at the time of this great war there would be battles being waged across the globe, I think he claims at least 72 battles would occur at the same time continuously.  In an article in New York Times I read once that there was indeed 79 battles being fought all over the planet and had been for decades now! 
Now with Saddam Hussan I truly believe that he is part of the triumvirate that the Antichrist (Union) uses to confuse the masses and to divert attention from themselves .  The triumvirate I believe is Saddam Hussan (The Decoy), Qadaffi (The Organizer of Islam behind the secret army which includes China, North Korea, North Africa, and temporally Russia called the Pan-Pacific Alliance), and Madeleine Albright (The Spy). 
The Antichrist Union I speak of is Kofi Annan and Jayantha Dhanapala his undersecretary (a position he himself created!).  Nostradamus says that he comes as two (just as Jesus did, w/ John the Baptist announcing the coming of Christ).  Nostradamus says that the gentle one would preceed the true tyrant.  They would be seen as great peace makers (Kofi Annan was the peace keeper for the UN for 35 yrs, both have been given peace awards over 12 times each across the globe), He says the black one would come in blue (Kofi Annan is African and the UN nations wear's a blue hat and flag!). He calls them Hannibal and Dha ( Kofi Annan & Jayantha Dhanapala!! Dha means the Ultimate one to assimilate all!)  I read Kofi's speech to the comity of the UN and he says in his speech that the reason Jayantha was not present at that moment was because that they were one, that he is I and I am him!!!  I could go one forever with so much more evidence which makes me 100%!!!!!! sure these men are indeed the Antichrist Union. Like when Nostradamus says that the Antichrist would announce to the world the two names of the most wanted terrorist in the world, gaining their release under the green branches in the dessert of Libya.  April of 99 Kofi Annan came on CNN announced that he had in this envelope (that he raised for all to see) the two names of the terrorist who bombed down the Pam-Am flight.  He had two meetings with Qadaffi in a tent in the dessert of Libya and persuaded Qadaffi to release the men.  An effort unsuccessfully done by the West for over 10yrs!!  This was his way of showing the world that he could get business done. 
I'm sorry that I have gone on like this it's just that I get so worked up.  I'm sure that you probably do not understand how I came about these conclusions through Nostradamus.  All I can say to you is that before I started to read the quatrains I experienced a very mysterious meditation, afterwards my mind kept screaming to get a book on Nostradamus.  There in the first quatrain was the meditation I performed but if one hadn't done it exactly like I did then one would not understand what Nostradamus was trying to say. 
There is one detail in the quatrain that is universally misunderstood, something he clearly meant to do.  Afterwards I read his letter to his son 3 X and finally understood why.  He didn't want to give certain organizations (who are in secrecy) the opportunity to use his words to manipulate and control man's future.  He basically didn't want to make it easier for them.  He warns that many people would try to decipher his words and they would fail.  Only a few would come to the right conclusions.  He gives two major clues on how to read his words and what to do to open your mind to them.  He clearly says that he is speaking to the Laymen-the simple minded.  So I understood clearly that he meant that he would load the quatrains with so much detail (with double meanings!), often repeating the message many times over and over again, changing the descriptive words each time.  He is basically telling two futures at once!  His immediate future and now!  He knew that people would be tempted to over analyze every phrase and word, this was his intention.  He understood that the ones who would conspire against the world would be intelligent and what do intelligent people do, over analyze!!  He had to also deceive innocent people, who where of better learning, for they could inadvertently reveal to much to soon.  It is the commoner with the common mind he is telling this story too!!  So in my conclusion I believe that the preface to his son, the epistle, quantrains, and prefaces are all one big story about the last great war but if you are trying to hard you will over analyze bits and pieces and be lead down a wild goose chase. 
Yes, sometimes you will strike gold but is it fools gold?  I have no idea if my approach is more authentic than yours or anyone else's but I can tell with much honesty that strange things have occurred to me since I started my investigations and distributed some of my work around NYC.  Many of my friends can verify my story because they were there.  For instance I was followed twice, I was questioned by strangers out of no where, someone left a message to me on my window seal (on the 5th floor!!) over night, my computer crashed forever, and since then I have met 5 people connected to the UN (one even stayed as a guest of my roommate, in my home, for 3 weeks!)  Anyhow there is much much more of Nostradamus's story that I have left out and if you believe that just a small bit my ring truth and you are interested let me know and I'll tell you more.  I will understand if you think I'm crazy, this is to be expected but I do 100% believe in what I am saying.  I even went and got my journals copy righted to prove to the world I wrote these words before they occurred. I hope I didn't bore you.  I look forward to more info and your opinion on my version of this great mystery.

Thaddius
* * * * *
Hello Thaddius,

Our views of history are similar.  I definitely hold to the idea that the Balkan Wars of 1912 and 1913, World War I, and World War II were the same war with an armistice 'separating' them.  The armistice was anything but a real peace.  Fighting continued in Europe until 1922. Mussolini began his war on Libya which lasted through much of the 1920s.  As Africa and the Middle East experienced civil unrest and colonial aggression, the 1930s ushered in the Pacific wars with the Japanese invasion of Manchuria in 1931. We know the rest.  Italy and Ethiopia, the Spanish Civil War, continued conflicts in the Pacific by Japan, insurrections in France by pro-Nazi sympathisers, the annexation of the Rhineland and Czechoslavakia.  Then the German invasion of Poland that most historians attribute as being the beginning of World War II.


One could even say that this 'great war' had its beginnings with the Triple Alliance between Germany, Austria, and Italy in 1882 which led to a series of European conflicts in the late 19th Century, most notably the Boer War begun 1899, several Balkans conflicts, one between Serbia and Bulgaria in 1885 and Greece and Turkey in 1897.  Meanwhile China and Japan fought over control of the Korean peninsula and the United States began testing its military power during the Spanish-American war in 1898. As the 19th Century gave way to the 20th, Russia went to war with Japan and turmoil began flaring up again the Balkans.  All the major participants in the Great War were already at loggerheads for thirty years before 1914. Some may well say that Bismarck paved the way for Hitler.

I don't suppose I really have a problem with your idea that the 'war' never truly ended in 1945. The Cold War brought many troubling conflicts to the world.  Hell, five years after America defeated the Japanese by dropping two crude atomic bombs from high-altitude bombers, it was locked in an unwinnable conflict in Korea that would claim more lives than in World War II (if you also count the Chinese casualties, that is).  The Cold War balance of terror has helped to make the Middle East a powderkeg since 1948.

So, if you like, we can call this whole thing and what is to come 'World War III.'  However, since hostilities have never completely ended since 1914 (or 1912) and grievances never properly redressed, we may as well call the whole thing 'the Great War' or 'the First World War' (since, in fact, World War I never truly ended as I have demonstrated).  Nostradamus has another name for it in his Epistle to Henry II, he calls this century-plus conflict 'the First Holocaust.'

The third battle which you are referring to wherein it will be a 'close call' is that war people will come to call 'World War III.'  As I have stated, it will likely begin in the Balkans and very quickly involve Russia in a war against Nato.  But what it will evolve into is a holy war between Moslem and Christian in the end.  Much of the West will be defeated (just as it appeared to be by the Nazis), but the Iranian-led axis will be driven out and utterly vanquished...for a time.

One thing you did miss in your analysis of Nostradamus is that he foresees several wars that he calls 'Crusades' wherein Moslem will fight Christian. I believe history will repeat itself.  Just as there was an armistice between World War I and World War II, I believe there will be an armistice between World War III ('the First Holocaust') and World War IV ('the war of the Attila and Xerxes').  Nor will the end of WWIV be the end to war, but humanity will get a much better break than it has for a long time...before the cycles of war begin again.

Saddam may have one last war to play out...he may not.  But his heir Uday Saddam Hussein will prove to be more formidable than his father when Saddam is dead.  Despite the fact that Kusay appears to hold the reins of power, I think he will be overthrown by Uday.  There will definitely be a coup in Iraq after Saddam Hussein is dead.  This whole game being played out in Babylon is an aberration of the United Nations (nice going, there, Thad). Annan and Saddam have an understanding, no doubt. But it is a dangerous game they play, ambushing one another.  These air assaults are mostly for show -- to prove to US citizens that their tax dollars are being funneled for a worthy cause.  I am more concerned about what Iraq will do after Saddam is dead -- Uday has said he would drive the Israeli nation into the sea. Perhaps he is 'the Arab Prince.'

Kofi Annan is "the black and angry one" who will make Saddam or Uday 'repent' for siding with the 'bloody Alus' (Bashar al-Assad [AL-ASsad]) against Israel.

Gadhafi is beginning a dynasty that will one day engulf the whole of Africa. Saef al-Islam will be the next major player after Moammar is dust.  Africa will be in and out of Middle East concerns over the decades to come.  Did not Nostradamus prophesy that faith will be broken between Africa and Asia? Africa will be a huge thorn in the underbelly of Europe for a very very long time and I wouldn't be surprised to see a Gadhafi in power two hundred years from now (I should live that long).

It's difficult to address all the issues you raise -- you raise so much!  I am somewhat sceptical about your Annan-Dhanapala-Albright triumvirate.  But that is partly because I do not believe we are yet living in the final seven-year period of Revelation (Tribulation).  I do not seek the Antichrist (or beast) because he is not yet here.  You and I will be mouldering in our graves long before that one comes, I believe!

There are many false antichrists (Nostradamus warns that there will be as many false antichrists as the Bible warns that there will be false messiahs!).  Saddam and Gadhafi are false antichrists.

Milosevic and Putin, like Hitler, are lesser antichrists.  The black-uniformed soldiers are preparing in the Balkans.  The world has little time and doesn't realise it.  KFOR soldiers will be sitting, talking, drinking, cracking jokes, flirting with barmaids, thinking all is peaceful...then the swarm will come and engulf the land and the people all in one day.  And Russia soon will come.  When China sees it and the Russian stooges in the Middle East like Iran Iraq, and Syria see it, they will not fear America and they will start their own wars.

In the sea, in the gulf, a blast will dissolve the ships in a brilliant flash of white...then clouds of black smoke.  And everyone will be afraid at the sight of it on their television screens.

Hungary will become the most dreadful battlefield man has ever known! I see the bridge burning, falling into the river with thousands of dead swelling the banks.  In Greece, Bulgaria, Turkey, the skin will turn black and peel off the flesh and the bones.  Eastern and Central Europe will see the flash of battlefield nuclear weapons.

It is a dreadful time that is coming, yet man will survive it.  But every war he wages will be worse than the one before.  He will make his peace longer because he will dread the returning cycle of war.

By the way, you have said that you have no idea if your approach to Nostradamus is more authentic than mine.  I should say now that I have not yet revealed what my approach to understanding Nostradamus is.  That is the subject of the book that I have written.

My web site is an entirely different thing:  it is my own conviction that history repeats many themes over and over again at regular intervals of seven years or multiples of seven years.  I use Nostradamus only to dramatise the 'nightmare scenario' these repetitions will eventually take and that some of them may happen soon.  I believe that Nostradamus also believed that history repeated itself and that is why a number of his quatrains appear to fulfill themselves more than once.  But he also believed in the 'novel event' (which for him the French Revolution was one example).

I agree that the quatrains are mostly quite plain to understand -- no hidden meanings or codes.  He described what he saw.  The problem is he described what he saw from a 16th Century, pre-Renaissance perspective.  Perhaps he thought Iraqi anti-aircraft fire ascending into the black sky against an unseen enemy looked like 'dreadful globes.' Then again he may have been describing the gas globes created by the initial blast of hydrogen bombs before they expand into mushroom clouds.  Even though he plainly states a thing such as 'dreadful globes,' we cannot be absolutely certain of the meaning.

Anyway, I wish I could address your thesis regarding the Antichrist Union, but I am afraid my ignorance and natural scepticism concerning the subject keeps me from contributing anything useful.  Sorry on that.

Thanks for writing.  Hope this letter was somewhat interesting and at least addressed some of the issues you raised.


Kind regards,

Michael

-----Original Message-----
From:
Thaddius
To:
mmcclellan@adelphia.net
Date: Thursday, September 14, 2000 8:40 PM
Subject: Re: Nostradamus and the New Prophecy Almanacs Newsletter

Hello there. I was amazed with the info you sent me about the connection between Tripoli, Moscow, and Belgrade!! I never knew. And I also didn't know about the Chinese armies presence in the Sudan. This only proves my theory even more. When you mentioned the attack on Italy I was shocked because this is exactly what I have told everyone, that two nuclear attacks would come from Tripoli against Italy. One would hit Avignon (an American military base) and the other some where in the Tuscany Mountains. NATO will be confused about the source of attack and end up bombing New Belgrade.

Yes, I do believe that Richard Butler is in it with Albright. I am not sure about what your opinion about the collapse of the UN, I assume it will end being replaced by the New World Order. The World Trade Organization and The World Bank Organization are just the beginning. I found out that the international bar code that appears on all products sold on this planet could be the 666 warned of in the bible. A computer expert friend of mine showed me what the lines in the barcode mean and he showed how the 3 lines that stick out (the first one the middle one and the last one) represents 6 in computer language (This system was partly created by Kofi in the early 70's!) This is partly why the New World Order will destroy the Catholic Church. Because it is one of the largest and richest independent organizations on the earth, it needs to be on board with the New Government or it will not work. The Catholic Church will refuse to give into its demands which leads to the attack on the Vatican and the death of the next pope (who will be young). The Church will relocate to the USA.

The hybrid humans I told you about are people who have been genetically altered with pig genes. They are living normal lives across America. It is the Church who are in care of watching them through out their lives. There are 5 side effects of this engineering. They look adrogineous often growing up being called tomboys or sissy boys. They have terrible tempers and can be quit intimidating with their voice when angered. Many will have unusual birth marks and benign tumors on the body. They will suffer from back and neck problems often having a severely straightened spine. They will be highly intelligent, some having chemical imbalances. By watching over these hybrids throughout their lives the Church secures its survival against the New World Order with NATO's protection.

I have lots of evidence that can collaborate many of the connections here. Many of the people who believe they were abducted by aliens are actually abducted by the secret western alliance for this purpose. Now they aren't like half pig and half human, they are mostly human with some genes spliced in, some more so than others. This has been occurring for 150 yrs. I recently came across an article which mentioned that the headquarters of the secret society of Freemason is less than a mile away from the worlds largest genetic engineering labs, which announced the first successful cloning of six pigs!!

I believe that it was a collaboration between the Freemason, Rosicrucians, House of Malta, and Royal Society that began this alliance in its present form 300 yrs ago. If you study America's history you will find that many of our most famous and influential leaders, scientist, and celebrities where members of one of these societies. The top ten CIA agents where members of the house of Malta, an ancient secret society with its roots coming from the Vatican! It was their intention to build a new nation with the most advanced civilization on earth in hopes of becoming the rulers of earth.

Yes, I understand that this is an ancient struggle that goes back further than 300 yrs as I have stated before that there is a 300 yr. cycle within a 1000 yr. cycle. Many attempts have been made over and over agian for world domination, we are only seeing the most recent attempt at the same old game. This goes eons back. You are absolutely right when you say they are trying to change scripture. You see The Catholics have been hiding the truth now for over 1500 yrs. Which will be part of their undoing. For I too believe that Annan will be over by 2002 being betrayed by Jayantha in the end. Jayantha will take control of the UN in 2002, one year after the true millennium which I believe is the beginning of the climax of what's to come. Jayantha will use information obtained by unknown sources to prove that Jesus was actually enlightened in India, during the 17 yrs or so he was not mentioned in the bible, then returning to Israel to teach what he had learned.

This caused great political unrest leading to the split between the rich Jews and the poor Jews. The rich Jews would later unite with the Romans to create the Roman Catholic Church, the poor Jews becoming the Jews we know today. Jesus I believe did not die on the cross but rescued by his wife living the rest of his life in the Pyrenees Mountains of France with his 3 children and wife Mary Magellan. He wrote his story down and preserved it in ceramic vases (Jayantha's info!). This is the secret Jayantha will use to destroy the Church, showing the people they were lied to for so long. He will then remind the people that he is a Bhuddist, a follower of the original form of Buddhism, that Jesus was influenced by. I found out that this is true, he is a known member of a sect of Buddhist who claim to be from the original source through Shri Lanka.

Now I also believe we should look out for President Jacques Chirac, I am not sure why but I sense something. Russia will eventually side with Europe after also being betrayed by China. China is the main culprit behind the Eastern Alliance because it has something to do with the return of the ancient Mongol King Ghengis Khan. Was Princess Diana the new Jesus and will she return next year. I never guessed that but I'm not completely opposed to the idea. I rather thought she would be from Iran. Who knows?

Well, I've said enough, to much probably hope you enjoy my story. Keep in touch.

Peace
Thaddius
* * * * *
Hello, Thad,

No question that Italy will be attacked by Gadhafi, with the possible aid of Sudan, Tunisia, and Algeria. I suspect there will be more than two nuclear attacks. Nostradamus mentions one horrific attack against the island of Sardinia and protracted attacks against the Ligurians (NW Italy). Also, the African siege will be laid before Milan for seven years.

Incidentally, I think you meant Aviano and not Avignon (which is in southern France). A pope will die nine miles from Avignon, fleeing the Tarascon monster.

Madeline Albright is the masculine woman who will force the West to confront Russia, vexing all of Europe and the United States. She is the U.N. Balkans agent as Butler is the U.N. spy in the Middle East theatre. After Clinton leaves office, Albright will be invited to run for president of Czechoslovakia. She'll really be close to the heart of hell then.

New Belgrade may be the New City attacked by fire at 45 degrees. Nato will have to have the blessing of the North Europeans and the French (Normans), who secretly pull the strings of the U.N., Nato, and the European Union. Nato and the U.N. will fold up their standards and a greater voice will be substituted. In the navel of the world...the Knights of Malta! Thus the Vatican will be a front for Danish, Swedish, Norwegian, Finnish, and Russian interests. You may have noted when looking at the world map that Sweden, Norway, and Finland form the head of a dragon.

The monster will be seen in broad daylight, forget the eclipse, he is on the world map!

666 is Lucifer tripled. Think, what was the planet Venus called when its was a morning star? Lucifer (Satan). The value of Venus in numerology is 6. Also look at how it works with letters: A = 1, B = 2, C = 3, etc until you reach I = 9. Then with J you start over again with J being 1 and K being 2 and so on. There are three letters in the alphabet that have the value of 6: F, O, and X, and they spell:

FOX.

A French pope is coming who will revitalise the Church. The great Chirac (Chiren) will become King of Europe and will restore the great Pontiff after the war. And the Catholic Church and the Church of Diana will co-exist and prosper.

Much later, when Europe is divided, one of its great kings will become friends with a great half-pig -- also a king! Oh yes, Nostradamus mentions these biologically-engineered humans often! And the heavens shall weep for these androgynous ones. Before the great Monarch they will be checked for birthmarks on their chins and mouths. These beloved of the Church will be persecuted and exterminated by the beast of Revelation...many years from now. This will be when the Church is but a corpse of its formere self when the Moon completes its cycle.

The Divine Right of Kings will return. A pope will dare to aspire to become both leader of the Vatican and King of Europe. But wars of religion will make this not so.

Between 2002 and 2003 the power of Malta and all of its satellites you mentioned will be destroyed by Moammar Gadhafi, the renegade, the desert fox.

FOX.

Malta falls first, in fact, before Sicily, Sardinia, Italy, and Spain. This will begin in August 2002, when Annan loses power. If you are correct, Jayantha presumably will become the new voice. But the Moslem-Christian conflict will be such that all the powers will be undone, even the ancient order. If Jayantha survives to 2006, he will die, if not before. A third of Russia and a third of the United States will be incinerated by Iranian-Chinese-Kazakh nuclear missiles.

All will be new. France will become the seat of the Empire. That is what Jacques Chirac has been groomed for since 1981. Longer ago than that in fact. He was personally selected by Charles DeGaulle in 1968 to become the future King of France. Francois Mitterand was an unexpected obstacle.

Indeed, who is the GREATEST European leader today if not Jacques Chirac?

Chirac will support the Temple of Diana because it was in Paris that she died. Indeed, he shall make her his patron saint. The English and the French will demand that this be so -- that Diana become the Queen of Heaven, the sister saviour, daughter of God. You speak of Mary Magdalene: it is from her many believe the Jesus bloodline sprang. Diana is said to have been descended fom it.

You mention Buddhism. Check my Pope John Paul II and the Rose page to see Diana attired in Indian garb attending a Buddhist temple.

I would expect her return, if not in the summer of 2001, then 2002. 2002 will be a very pivotal year -- dreadful and wonderful. People will not know whether they are reaping or sowing. Watch my site for future developments about this very special year -- what I have on site thus far is but a skeleton awaiting its flesh!

Thanks for writing (and reading).

Kind regards,

Michael

-----Original Message-----
From:
Thaddius
To:
mmcclellan@adelphia.net <mmcclellan@adelphia.net>
Date: Friday, September 15, 2000 8:13 PM
Subject: Re: Nostradamus and the New Prophecy Almanacs Newsletter

I am really intrigued on your interpretation of the same information.  We are definitely on to something.  Here we are two strangers who have never spoken before and yet we have reach very similar theories, differing only in minor details but united in the basic them. 

The Princess Diana view you have is quite amazing.  I have always loved her greatly as do many people.  I knew that Jesus' blood line survived through the European Royalty but I hadn't known the connection to Diana.  I also didn't know that she was involved with Buddhism.  If indeed these things ring true then she may very well be the New Christ. I think that even Mother Theresa saw Princess Diana as someone very special, they were very close. 

When you mentioned Chirac becoming friends with a half-pig man who would be King I fell from my chair.  For my theory has always been that the secret societies of the West were using people who were bred persa' through Royal European bloodlines.  They were trying to manipulate certain genetic markers before they introduced the pig genes into the bloodline.  Then when you mentioned their demise I knew we were definitely on to something because I also interpreted that this new race would be slaughtered out of fear. Furthermore I believe Nostradamus was trying to tell us that part of the reason Princess Diana was killed is because she knew of this secret and was prepared to protect the human hybrids (I'm not sure but I think that she was also prepared to reveal the truth to the world) ...
NOTE: The remainder of the letter and my responce were of a confidential nature and will not be reproduced here.

 


 

Other Email Forums

 

The Madonna Email Forum

The Princess Diana Email Forum

Pope Benedict XVI and the Rose Prophecy Email Forum

Early 21st Century Email Forum

Best of the Email Forums (Part 1)

Email Forum Archives (1)

Email Forum Archives (2)

The Hungarian Letters